ActivepiecesActivepieces
VS
MakeMake

Activepieces vs Make — Which One Wins?

A detailed, side-by-side comparison of Activepieces and Make to help you pick the right tool for your workflow.

TLDR

Quick Verdict

Make takes the lead with a 4.5 rating and is best for users who need more complex automation logic than zapier offers at a more affordable price.. Activepieces (4.0) is the better pick if you need teams wanting an open-source automation platform that is simpler to set up than n8n..

Side-by-Side Comparison

CriteriaActivepiecesMake
Rating★★★★ 4.0(45)★★★★ 4.5(312)
Pricing Modelopen_sourcefreemium
Starter Price$25/mo (Cloud Pro, 50K tasks)$10.59/mo (Core, 10K ops)
Free TierYesYes
Platformsweb, linuxweb
Learning Curveeasymedium
API AvailableYesYes
Best ForTeams wanting an open-source automation platform that is simpler to set up than n8n.Users who need more complex automation logic than Zapier offers at a more affordable price.
Verdictsituationalrecommended

Feature Checklist

FeatureActivepiecesMake
Open source and self-hostable
Visual flow builder
Community-built pieces (integrations)
Branching and conditional logic
Custom pieces with TypeScript
Webhook triggers
Visual flowchart workflow builder
Routers and conditional logic
Iterators and aggregators
Error handling
1,500+ app integrations
Webhooks and HTTP modules

Activepieces

Pros

  • Simplest open-source automation platform to self-host
  • Clean, modern interface that rivals commercial tools
  • Community-driven integration development

Cons

  • Much smaller integration library than Zapier, Make, or n8n
  • Younger platform with fewer production deployments
  • Less documentation and community resources than n8n

Make

Pros

  • More powerful than Zapier for complex automation logic
  • Visual flowchart builder makes complex workflows understandable
  • More affordable than Zapier for high-volume, complex automations

Cons

  • Steeper learning curve than Zapier
  • Fewer app integrations than Zapier (1,500+ vs 6,000+)
  • Operation counting can be confusing initially

The Bottom Line

Both Activepieces and Make are solid tools in the No-Code & Automation space. Make edges ahead with a stronger overall rating (4.5 vs 4.0) and is the better choice for users who need more complex automation logic than zapier offers at a more affordable price.. However, if you prioritize teams wanting an open-source automation platform that is simpler to set up than n8n., Activepieces is worth serious consideration. We recommend trying the free tier or trial of each before committing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Activepieces better than Make?
Make scores higher overall with a 4.5 rating vs 4.0. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs. Activepieces is best for Teams wanting an open-source automation platform that is simpler to set up than n8n., while Make is best for Users who need more complex automation logic than Zapier offers at a more affordable price..
Can I switch from Activepieces to Make?
Yes, most users can migrate between the two. Make offers a free tier to test before committing.
Which is more affordable, Activepieces or Make?
Activepieces starts at $25/mo (Cloud Pro, 50K tasks), while Make starts at $10.59/mo (Core, 10K ops). Activepieces offers a free tier. Make offers a free tier.