Plane vs ProofHub — Which One Wins?
A detailed, side-by-side comparison of Plane and ProofHub to help you pick the right tool for your workflow.
Quick Verdict
ProofHub takes the lead with a 4.1 rating and is best for growing teams who want predictable flat-rate pricing. Plane (3.9) is the better pick if you need teams that want an open-source, self-hostable alternative to jira or linear.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Criteria | Plane | ProofHub |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★★★★ 3.9(44) | ★★★★ 4.1(47) |
| Pricing Model | open_source | paid |
| Starter Price | $7/user/mo | $45/mo flat |
| Free Tier | No | No |
| Platforms | Web | web, ios, android |
| Learning Curve | easy | medium |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Best For | Teams that want an open-source, self-hostable alternative to Jira or Linear | Growing teams who want predictable flat-rate pricing |
| Verdict | recommended | recommended |
Feature Checklist
| Feature | Plane | ProofHub |
|---|---|---|
| Issue tracking | — | |
| Cycles and sprints | — | |
| Modules | — | |
| Roadmaps | — | |
| Self-hosting option | — | |
| API and webhooks | — | |
| Flat-rate pricing | — | |
| Proofing tool | — | |
| Gantt charts | — | |
| Time tracking | — | |
| Custom roles | — |
Plane
Pros
- ✓Open-source and self-hostable
- ✓Clean interface
- ✓Good feature set
- ✓Active development
Cons
- ✕Less polished than Linear
- ✕Smaller ecosystem
- ✕Self-hosting requires maintenance
ProofHub
Pros
- ✓Flat pricing saves money at scale
- ✓Built-in proofing is unique
- ✓No feature gating
Cons
- ✕UI feels corporate
- ✕Integrations are limited
- ✕No free tier
The Bottom Line
Both Plane and ProofHub are solid tools in the Project Management space. ProofHub edges ahead with a stronger overall rating (4.1 vs 3.9) and is the better choice for growing teams who want predictable flat-rate pricing. However, if you prioritize teams that want an open-source, self-hostable alternative to jira or linear, Plane is worth serious consideration. We recommend trying the free tier or trial of each before committing.